Pages

Monday, March 30, 2015

Backcountry Rescues

            Last week, the Department of Environmental Conservation’s Forest Rangers and the State Police launched an overnight search and rescue mission to look for an adjunct SUNY Potsdam professor, Ningyun Cai, and her two young sons on Mount Marcy.  The rescue, which involved more than 30 forest rangers, conservation officers and state troopers, took place in whiteout conditions with wind gusts up to 40 miles per hour near the summit of the state’s highest peak.  It was initiated after Cai and her sons, age 7 and 11 were disoriented in a snowstorm and couldn’t find their way back to the trail below tree line, where they had stashed most of their gear.
            Although backcountry rescues due to freak accidents are somewhat inevitable, rescues such as this raise the question of what can be done to reduce the amount of rescues done each year for people who are ill-prepared for the terrain or conditions as well as how to fund these highly expensive rescues.  To reduce rescue frequency, many people advocate for increased backcountry skills and wilderness first aid education among backcountry enthusiasts, but this is potentially problematic in it’s ability to reach its intended audience. Many visitors to the Adirondacks may only be in town for a weekend and might not have time to spend a day or two (which is probably the absolute minimum for the amount of time it takes to get even remotely comfortable with wilderness skills) getting the proper education about wilderness safety.  In addition to a lack of skills and education, many people blame a lack of proper equipment as a reason that a rescue was needed.  While it is true that many rescues, especially in the winter, are done for people who lack the proper equipment, it would be hard to police the gear required without having a TSA style bag check at each trailhead where rangers check personal backpacks for the proper gear.
            When it comes to funding rescue efforts, many people argue that the rescued party should have to pay for the rescue.  While the costs of backcountry rescues in most other parts of the world fall on those being rescued, this is not common practice in the United States.  Some rescues are unfortunately unavoidable, regardless of skill level or equipment carried, as no amount of warm clothing is going to fix an unexpected heart attack in the backcountry.  While many argue that rescues done for the ill prepared should be funded by the rescued party, this is problematic because it would require a very strict set of regulations about preparedness that would need to acknowledge an infinite amount of possible rescue scenarios to determine if the party was in fact unprepared for the conditions and terrain. 
            Perhaps the major recreation organizations in the Adirondacks and the DEC should work together to develop an easily accessible program with readily available online resources to educate and prepare people for the backcountry, especially in the winter. If courses and small group hikes were more available and more highly advertised to the general public, we might be able to avoid many search and rescue missions.

Sources:




No comments:

Post a Comment