The honeybee is an unsung hero in
many of the world’s ecosystems. Yet, these bees are starting to receive some
appreciation and attention due to the unfortunate circumstances of Colony
Collapse Disorder (CCD), a condition in which honeybee colonies experience
inexplicable population drops when bees leave the hive and never return. There
is still no definitive explanation for the cause of CCD, but scientists have
begun extensive studies to get to the root of the problem, fearing that human
activity may be a major contributing factor. Thus far, studies have identified
a number of potential culprits, including common honeybee parasites and
pathogens, chemical toxins and insecticides, and destruction of natural
habitats.
Habitat destruction is especially
concerning, as it is most directly linked to human activity. Studies suggest that honeybee habitat loss resultant of human
activity can correlated with CCD incidence. The number of honeybee colonies in
the United States has steadily declined for the last 30 years, and
coincides with substantial decrease in total cropland, pastureland and rangeland
area in the United States as land becomes developed. Following this trend,
fewer types of pollen and fewer potential hive sites are available to the
honeybees in developed areas, which may contribute to malnutrition and colony
instability.[1]
In this race
against time to identify the causes of CCD and develop remedial programs, one
study had emerged from the Adirondacks, and the results may be surprising. One team of scientists studied the northern hardwood forests,
and in true Adirondack fashion, to identify the effects of logging on midsummer
diversity in native bee populations. They measured bee
abundance and diversity on a series of 5-acre plots two and three years after
experimental logging removed 30, 60, or 100% of the trees. They found that
logging actually led to a significant increase in native bee diversity and
abundance. Data show the most bee abundance on plots where 60% of the trees
were logged, leaving a thin canopy and mostly open, sunny ground. Bee abundance
was ten times higher in 60% logged plots than in 30% logged or clear-cut plots,
although bee diversity was highest in clear-cut plots.[2]
The
scientists reasoned that logging treatment influences the floral resources
available to bees. Tree removal allowed more sun to reach the forest floor,
encouraging growth of flowering herbaceous and weedy plants that bees need for
nutrition. And since most critters will follow the food, bee populations are
often directly correlated with flower abundance. Logged areas might also
increase types of hive sites for bees, such as dead wood (slash) and weeds,
which may help colony stability. [2]
This
study suggests that some things are good in moderation. Humans may not be as
destructive as is assumed, although we have a long way to go until we can live
in complete harmony with nature. Still, Dean Thompson, a beekeeping hobbyist in
the Hamilton College community estimates that beekeeping is becoming more
popular a result of the spreading news about Colony Collapse Disorder. We need
more research and awareness of honeybee welfare before CCD can be tackled in
any definitive way, but for now, the bees keep buzzing and the rest of us have
reason to hope.
[1] Naug, Dhruba. "Nutritional Stress Due to
Habitat Loss May Explain Recent Honeybee Colony Collapses." Biological
Conservation 142.10 (2009): 2369-372. Print.
[2] Romey, W. L., J. S. Ascher, D. A. Powell, and M.
Yanek. "Impacts of Logging on
Midsummer Diversity of Native
Bees (Apoidea) in a Northern Hardwood Forest." Journal of the
Kansas Entomological Society 80.4 (2007): 327-38. Web.
Thanks for sharing Bridget. I'm humorously conflicted on this one. As someone who's extremely allergic to bees part of me wants to cheer for the decrease in population. I'm definitely digging deep to recognize the universal benefit of the bees. It sounds like we may not have much to worry about with their resiliency.
ReplyDelete