Me with the American Falls behind (3/6/16) |
As
the Adirondacks allured the Romantics in the nineteenth century, Niagara Falls continues
to entice sightseers from all over the world. Compared to the 7-10 million
annual visitors to the Adirondack Park, Niagara Falls is visited by almost 28
million tourists every year. Last weekend, I joined the ranks of those who seek
to appreciate those grandiose waterfalls and spontaneously traveled to see the
iconic destination. During my visit, I made many parallels to the Adirondack
Park and was forced to re-evaluate my stance on preservation and tourism.
Undoubtedly,
Niagara Falls and the Adirondacks are popular tourist destinations, especially
in the summer. As I walked around Niagara Falls State Park, it was obvious that
the park catered to summer tourism over winter tourism. I passed many boarded-up
ice cream stands and was denied access to the best walking paths closer to the
falls. Unlike Adirondack winter tourism, which provides skiing, snowmobiling,
etc., Niagara Falls completely lacks alternative activities to visiting the
waterfalls themselves. I concluded that Niagara Falls State Park heavily
invests and relies on summer tourists.
The American Falls at Niagara Falls (3/6/16) |
Upon
returning from my trip, I researched the Niagara Falls industry because I
noticed that there was a large power plant right outside of Niagara Falls. I
learned that beyond aesthetic value, Niagara Falls has been highly valued for
its hydropower. Similar to trees in the Adirondacks, water provides an
important natural resource for industry. In 1881, Jacob F. Schoellkopf built
Niagara’s River’s first hydroelectric generating station and today American and
Canadian power plants produce nearly 2.5 million kilowatts of electricity.
The
development of the Niagara Falls area strongly reminded me of the exploitation
of the Adirondack forest. It was clear that industrialization and tourism both
threaten the natural surrounding of Niagara Falls. However, I felt conflicted about
the preservation of and public access to the park. In my mind, I heard the
voice of contemporary Adirondack guide, Brian McDonnell, “…people want little
bites of wilderness. They want to be quickly immersed for a very short period
of time and then get back to their real life”(Schneider 195). This fleeting
appreciation of nature was notable at Niagara Falls. After I snapped a few
pictures on my iPhone and posted it on Instagram, I felt incredibly guilty for
not being completely present at the waterfalls.
My Instagram photo of the American Falls |
While I believe that people try to
appreciate nature (for this is the reason so many tourists are still drawn to
Niagara Falls), I think that tourism ironically takes away an authentic and
genuine appreciation of nature. While walking away from the waterfalls, my
friend said, “I kind of wished everything wasn’t so built up. It would have
been cooler if you saw the falls after you had to hike or something.” Although I
agreed with him, part of me was pessimistic and wanted to tell him that Niagara
Falls was a spectacle that lost its wilderness essence a long time ago.
Sources:
Schneider, Paul. The Adirondacks: A History
of America's First Wilderness. 1st ed. New York: H. Holt and Co, 1997.
Print.
I'm from Buffalo, NY, and so this definitely hits close to home (Niagara Falls is just 20 minutes away). I definitely think its interesting to consider the effects of tourism on the falls, and how it takes away from the nature aspect of it. There's a separate part of the falls that isn't as widely advertised, and its the Niagara Falls Gorge hike. This hike has less tourism, and is definitely more emphasized on the nature surrounding the Niagara River leading up to the Falls. This comparison definitely makes me wonder about the future of the park. It scares me to think that the natural beauty and "wilderness" of the park may eventually lead to over-developing the park. Sometimes I wonder if the rising housing developments in the park is a future indicator of the over-development of it.
ReplyDelete