Monday, September 29, 2014
Infertile to Protected
We have talked a good amount about why farming failed in the Adirondacks. The reasons for this agricultural failure are manifold, including thin soil, early frost, not optimal size of soil, high variability of soils, the acidic soil and so on. If all of these factors add up to land that the colonists deemed inhospitable and downright bad, it begs the question what is good land? I think the answer to this question changes with time and social constructions of what is good, but in the days of the European settlers of Northeastern America good land was agriculturally productive land. This seems to be true for most western, capitalist societies but there are and were philosophies that value other lands such as sacred lands of Native American tribes or extremely manicured and balanced gardens in many Asian cultures. In these examples both the sacred land and the garden, as well as agriculturally productive land, require human protection and maintenance to some degree. I find it very interesting and impressive that the Adirondacks, which had been deemed infertile and impassable for so long, rose to a similar level of human appreciation as farm land and sacred land to receive man's protection and maintenance.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
It's also interesting to think about what the ADKs would look like if the land had been fertile and agriculturally productive. Would the vast forest still exist, or would it be as developed and clear-cut as other New England farmland areas?
ReplyDeleteIts funny to think that since the Adirondacks were considered "bad" land we are now able to have the incredible land we have today. I'm sure if there was farmable land or even land that supported industry, the park would look much different than it does today. It would almost certainly not even be a state park!
ReplyDelete