In Wandering Home, Bill McKibben discusses
his great dislike for a giant house that overlooks his town. He says, “As I
walk, my eye keeps returning to a hilltop overlooking the town, where some
outlander has cleared a patch and then, as if from a spaceship, plunked down a
“home” huge enough to be a junior high school” (McKibben 21). McKibben says
that when he thinks about this unnecessarily large house he can feel himself
“starting to heat up from the inside” (21). This immediately reminded me of an
issue in my town over this past summer that ignited a very similar response in
my community.
In my hometown—Cohasset,
MA—there’s an area called James’ Island that’s right on the water. The land is
actually more of a peninsula than an island, and it juts into what is called
Little Harbor, one of the most desirable places to live. For years it was just
a wooded area—not exactly conservation land, but thought to be unbuildable—therefore
leaving no reason for the town to buy it to protect it. However, over the
summer a family bought the land and made plans to build a five bedroom 7,823-square-foot
mansion on the seven-acre lot. The blueprints of the house sparked an outrage
from the neighbors and a lot of my town, leading the community to make a Facebook
page titled “Save James Island” in protest. My town really came together over
the issue, bringing widespread attention and creating town meetings to discuss
it. One neighbor said in an interview that, “This new mega mansion home site
will destroy beautiful wetlands, beautiful trees, a bird sanctuary, and a
wildlife sanctuary…Little Harbor’s eco-culture will be completely destroyed
forever” (Seltz). The objections focused on
the ecological damage the house could cause and allegations that the design of
the house would not meet conservation standards.
People
are often driven by their own interests, not stopping to think about the
effects their actions can have on others. McKibben
says that it’s this “hyper-individualism that thinks nothing of ruining
everyone else’s view with a house four times too large for any conceivable
purpose” (McKibben 21). The family in my town was
not thinking of the effects their ‘dream’ home would have on the surrounding
community. They planned to build the three-story mansion on the high point of
the island, ruining the view of the harbor for all surrounding houses. One
neighbor complained that it would be “the equivalent of a seven-story Taj Mahal
for 20 families to look at for the rest of their lives” (Seltz). It would have
been less of an outrage if the family had been more considerate of the
neighbors and environment by building their incredibly large dream house somewhere
else, or at least on another part of the property where it would have fewer
effects.
On September 4th, my town held the final meeting about the
issue. Cohasset voted to decline the family’s plans of construction. So at
least for now James’ Island is saved from the “hyper-individualism” that is so
prevalent today.
Citations:
McKibben, Bill. Wandering Home: A Long Walk across America's
Most Hopeful Landscape, Vermont's
Champlain Valley and New York's Adirondacks. New York: Crown Journeys, 2005. Print.
Seltz, Johanna. "Cohasset Family’s Plan to Build ‘dream
Home’." BostonGlobe.com. Boston
Globe, 7 Aug. 2015. Web. 10 Sept. 2015. <https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/regionals/south/2015/08/07/cohasset- family-plan-build-dream-home-runs-against-neighbors-view/VjgDK4wTjX8PHwzA7duOwO/story.html>.
This is a very interesting issue in terms of being reflective of contemporary attitudes as a whole. Although I am against unnecessary large-scale development such as this, I had been having a difficult time verbalizing the problem with enjoying land through development versus enjoying land in a more natural state. After reading this, I can now articulate that an individual has no right to degrade a landscape as a whole simply because of land ownership; Hardin's Commons exists regardless of deeded lines. Thanks for the example!
ReplyDelete