In Bill McKibben’s Wandering Home, he speaks longingly of a
society that’s able to exist in a mutually beneficial relationship with the
land rather than the parasitic one our current society participates in today.
His prospective tone reveals that he imagines this society as yet to arrive. In
that sense, it’s clear he views this potential future relationship as a
positive progression. Perhaps then, the boon of ‘progress’ the Adirondacks
experienced at the hands of European settlers, while deemed ‘progress,’ may not
have necessarily been positive. As McKibben looks forward to the formation of
this coexisting society, we should all look backwards for the inspiration.
Native Americans throughout North
America operated with knowledge of the potential hazards of our current
parasitism. Their notion of their people’s collective involvement in ‘The Great
Long House’ illuminates a key distinction in approach to the earth’s resources
between mutualism and parasitism. Because they viewed themselves as inhabitants
within the ecosystem rather than apart from it, they recognized that they were
not impervious to the consequences of abuse. The European approach stands
directly opposite and positions mankind as only part-time visitors in the
wilderness. This perceived temporary involvement in the ecosystem led to a
dynamic in which the wilderness existed only to provide resources. After these
resources were harvested, Europeans left the wilderness to return home, or at
least thought of it that way. In reality, there really is but one ‘Great Long
House’ and no one lives outside of it. These dueling approaches to nature
explain the Native’s sustainable hunting and farming practices as well as the
European method of plunder.
Upon realizing the wisdom of the
Native lifestyle, their eradication stands as an egregious error in
development. If McKibben is right in believing that mutualism is the true
example of progress then perhaps the wrong way of life won. The irony becomes
apparent when it is said that the Europeans brought along progress and catapulted
society forward. It may be justified when we feel a sense of stupidity upon
realizing that those ‘savages’ had it figured out all along.
Works
Cited:
McKibben, Bill. Wandering
Home: A Long Walk Across America’s Most Hopeful Landscape. New
York: St. Martin’s Press, 2005. Print.
Scheider, Paul. The Adirondacks: A History of America's First Wilderness. New York: H. Holt, 1998. Print.
Scheider, Paul. The Adirondacks: A History of America's First Wilderness. New York: H. Holt, 1998. Print.
While I like a lot of what is said in this post, I think it is important to remember that the concept of "The Great Longhouse" was an idea largely focused in the northeast. There were, of course, other conservationist philosophies unique to other Native American populations. It is important to remember the unique elements to Native American Nations to avoid generalizations that can lead to a cloudy understanding of natural history.
ReplyDelete