I am in favor of the humane trapping and hunting of non-predatory species. At the start of the semester, I couldn’t bear the thought of killing wild animals just to wear their fur or eat their meat. However, after reading Paul Schneider’s The Adirondacks, I realized that trapping and hunting are more ethical and can control populations unlike fur farms.
Schneider explains that the “anti-fur logic, by necessity, imparts a moral superiority to the products of human industry and agriculture over those ‘harvested in the wild’” (73). I did not think much of this statement until Steve Hall from the Adirondack Wildlife Refuge explained fur farms. He shared that fur farms focus solely on the animals’ furs and ignore their living conditions. Trapping, on the other hand, captures wildlife that experienced suitable conditions. Because of this, trapping and hunting are morally superior options.
Buying from trappers helps finance their work so that they may continue their ethical trapping. A Cornell University study found that only 20% of trappers made money, while another 59% broke even or lost money. Intelligent buying can encourage and enable the more sustainable and ethical trapping and hunting industry. This also enables trappers to maintain their stake in preserving the land because their livelihood depends on the ecosystem’s health (Schneider 73).
My one concern regarding trapping and hunting is the harvesting of predators. Although all species play a role in the ecosystem, predators have an especially important one because they control population sizes of their prey, which then controls the population of the prey’s prey, and so on. When predators, such as wolves and cougars in the Adirondacks, are removed, their prey’s populations often rise to unsustainable levels. For example, deer and beaver populations in the Adirondacks are incredibly high. This leads to several issues including overgrazing and increased incidents with humans, such as car crashes. In response to these uncontrolled populations, humans have adopted the role of “natural predator” by maintaining populations with hunting and trapping permits. In fact, New York relies on hunters for their beaver population management (Schneider 73).
I hope this post shows that trapping and hunting, when sustainable, can actually benefit the ecosystem and humans. Hunting and trapping is often more ethical, supportive of locals, and beneficial to the ecosystem than fur farming. Although there are issues, such as the hunting of predators, hunting and trapping play a vital role in the Adirondacks.
An image of Steve Hall and a wolf. The wolves' removal from the Adirondacks has led to uncontrolled population growth of deer and beavers. Luckily, hunting and trapping permits can help reduce their populations.
Works Cited:
http://adirondackwildlife.org/WolfieKissMothersDay2008.JPG
I agree that trapping is far more ethical/humane than fur farms. After reading Schneider, I will never forget the idea of the trapper as an naturalist. I think that truly good trappers cultivate skills and even an appreciation of nature that allow them to be successful in their trapping. Conversely, fur farms definitely reduce the quality of life for the animals.
ReplyDeleteSimilar to you, I originally thought that I was anti-hunting and trapping. However, after taking a few Environmental Studies courses, I've realized the need to adjust that opinion. The lack of predators in regions has lead to massive growth in populations of deer and beaver, which are damaging the environment in their own ways with their large numbers. A hunter or trapper, who are in tune with nature and wildlife, are stepping in as predators to those animals.
ReplyDeleteNice blog thaanks for posting
ReplyDeleteGreat posst thankyou
ReplyDelete