Pages

Tuesday, February 2, 2016

The Wolf Wars

Everybody knows that dogs are supposed to be "man's best friend." Used once for hunting and herding livestock, the dog has transitioned into a household animal around the globe. However, our domesticated canine has a well-known relative that is not nearly as worshiped as Lassie or Shiloh - the wolf.

When Europeans settled present-day North America, they brought with them their religions, values and beliefs from the Old World. Inspired by fairy tales, such as those of Brother Grimm's, many Europeans arrived to America with the perception that wolves were evil and should be feared and destroyed. In fact, just ten years after the Mayflower landed at Plymouth Rock in 1620, the Massachusetts Bay Colony began offering bounty for every wolf that was killed [1]. Colonists were able to earn a month’s salary for a single wolf kill [2]. In the 19th century, the fur trade sprung to life. In addition to trapping and hunting beavers and mink, wolf pelts were added to the list of desirable fur, and a greater number of wolves were killed each year to support the economic demand.

Over time, colonists spread outward and encroached farther into the wilderness where the wolves roamed. As deer were hunted by humans for food, forests were destroyed for logging, and farms became more common, domestic livestock replaced the white-tailed deer as the wolf’s primary prey. In retaliation, a large anti-wolf campaign swept through America, and in just a quarter of a century, hunters killed over 80,000 wolves in Montana alone [1]. Due to this overhunting and habitat destruction, wolves disappeared from New York State around 1900 [3].

Yet, this has not always been the case. Native Americans believed that wolves were closely linked to their spirituality, and thought them to have mystical powers. Even in ancient times, wolves carried an element of respect. As Roman legend has it, Ancient Rome was founded by two twin brothers who had been abandoned as infants and raised by a she-wolf until a farmer found them.

In recent decades, scientists have also put greater effort into researching and understanding wolves, and now realize how dependent ecosystems are on their primary predators. With the absence of wolves in the Adirondacks, populations of white tailed deer and other species that wolves would prey on have increased unchecked. Herbivores, like deer, have overgrazed grassy regions, depleting vegetation, which has strong impacts on local water quality and the ecosystem [2]. Additionally, coyotes have become more prominent in the park, killing cats and endangering livestock [4].


In response to the work of ecologists, wildlife groups around New York State have been advocating for the reintroduction of wolves in the Adirondack State Park. In addition to the ecological benefits, some push for the reintroduction of wolves simply to return the park to its natural, pre-human state. However, there has been pushback from farmers stating that the reintroduction of wolves to the park will create further economic distress, as wolves will cause more livestock loss. What is the right answer? Should we mess with nature more and reintroduce wolves to the Adirondack Park? Or are we morally obligated to do so, since we humans were the ones who eliminated wolves from the park not long ago?

Sources:
[2]: http://www.adirondack.net/adirondack-advocacy/2015/09/rewilding-the-adirondacks-the-influence-of-wolves.html
[4]: http://www.esf.edu/pubprog/brochure/coyote/coyote.htm

1 comment:


  1. Great post! Reintroduction I feel has been an ongoing discussion in many places in the world. While wolf reintroduction has been successful in some places, many of those places had limited to no human settlement. Potential conflict with people, as you touch on, I think is a really important factor in considering reintroduction.

    When I was abroad, I visited the Ngorongoro crater, a multiple land use protected area in Tanzania. The government sanctioned human settlement in the 1990’s and around 3,000 Maasai lived there with 50,000 cattle. However, now the population is upwards of 200,000 and there are over a million cows competing for resources. In addition, lions and other predators are eating the cattle and in turn the Maasai are killing them. There is a really big discussion going on right now there about how this conflict should be dealt with. While much larger, the Adirondacks does function in a similar way. People and wildlife coexist now and there are issues even without wolves and mountain lions roaming around. I think it would be a great thing for the ecosystem of the park, but to me the Adirondacks is more than just that. The land has been changed so much for so long.

    ReplyDelete