Pages

Sunday, October 26, 2014

ENVST 220 Does Architecture


The Most Elaborate Treehouse There Ever Was
                                             Camp Peregrine
                                            Solar-Powered Air Freshener
                                             Cabin of Champions
When we created hypothetical new homes in the Adirondacks this week, it added a new level to something I have been thinking more and more about lately. I have been having a much harder time defining the word progress. This is mostly due to the fact that I am having trouble putting value on the major gains and losses that our species has made over time. Medicine, for example, has become more advanced than the average person can understand in the last few decades alone. Part of me is in awe of the fact that we now know enough about the brain to consider neuroscience its own field – and an ever-growing one at that. However, I am disappointed at the same time at the seemingly endless and ongoing destruction of the natural world around us. To anyone who bothers to investigate them, environmental issues are glaringly obvious. Looking at our fantasy ‘wilderness’ homes, it’s hard to say which aspects of them represent progress and which ones don’t. Is progress the alternative energy we hypothetically powered them with? Or is the fact that we are adding homes to the park (“green” or not) the exact opposite regardless of what type of energy we used? It doesn’t seem to be doing the park any good either way, so does that mean progress is only ever defined from the point of view of humans? It seems to me that we try to quantify and measure progress when it exists in a totally separate sphere from the environment's perspective than from ours.

No comments:

Post a Comment