Today’s Terrie reading includes one of the most revealing
quotes about the Adirondacks that I’ve read thus far: “The Adirondack story remained a story of nature, but just what nature
meant continued to depend on what one demanded of nature, what one expected of
nature to be and to do” (106). It makes sense that the topic of land use in
the Adirondack Park would begin with such a quote—after all, this central
question is where most Adirondack debate springs from: what do we want from nature?
We’ve already discussed this question quite a bit, and
everyone seems to agree that there is no definite answer. This is a situation
in life where agreeing to disagree isn’t just acceptable, it’s anticipated.
There are a variety of interests that immediately come to
mind: recreation, business, inhabitation (of humans), and complete
preservation. These different interests intersect in a complex array of
controversies and commonalities.
A quick glimpse of Adirondack controversies:
Recreation, business,
and inhabitation vs. preservation efforts
Recreation can
coexist with business (i.e. tourism),
and inhabitation (of humans), but it
can also hinder preservation efforts
(via ski resorts, ATVing, etc).
Business and
recreation vs. habitat and recreation
Business efforts
often ruin habitat, for both humans
who inhabit the Adirondacks as well as for wildlife. It can also make some
forms of recreation less feasible,
if it leads to the destruction of necessary forest space and animal
populations.
Habitation vs. business
and recreation
For some people, the Adirondacks exists first and foremost
as a place to inhabit: it is their
home (Bill McKibben, anyone?). For many of these Adirondackers, business and most recreation, such as ATVing pose a huge threat to their idea of
“nature.”
Business à
Adirondacks?
Although business
seems like the major villain in the story of the Adirondacks, I doubt that the
Adirondacks could exist as it does without its “wilderness commodities”:
lumber, ore, and recreational areas
(i.e. Tupper Lake).
The topic of land use is the foundation of Adirondack
history. It is embedded in nearly everything we’ve discussed thus far—and with
such a diversity of Adirondack inhabitants, vacationers, and businesspeople,
the Adirondacks will remain as “Forever Controversial” as it is “Forever wild.”
No comments:
Post a Comment