the question that really interests me is since climate
change is such a large-scale issue, what are some of the things that should be
happening politically, and I have done my best to answer this myself a little more clearly. I propose is much larger action. I believe that the
government should be taking a much larger role in regulating carbon emissions.
One way I see this happening is through a carbon tax where the government taxes
carbon emissions based on how much an individual, or a company emits. I also
suggest that the government places a carbon cap which will limit the amount of
emissions produced by companies. This to me seems to be a no brainer in the most idealistic of ways; it
generates money and controls our carbon footprint. Many may argue that just a
cap alone or a tax alone should be sufficient but a cap is much more effective
in controlling big companies while a tax will add incentive to individuals to
reduce their emissions. This may finally even the playing field for renewable
energy. Currently, there is no incentive to switch to clean energy sources
because things like solar panels and electric cars are expensive and
inconvenient to switch to, not to mention the monopoly dirty energy has in our
society. It is time these companies pay for their waste. And the money made off
of these carbon taxes? The government can allocate these unused funds towards
public clean energy movements. While the smaller proposals are not off track,
I believe these things need to be tackled from a top down approach. If the
government begins changing policy this will trickle down incentives to avoid
any additional fees and in turn start implementing these small scale changes, maybe in a different way, but with more impacting outcomes.
I think these are great ideas. Especially using the money saved from caps or the money gained from taxes, and recycling that into progressive environmental programs. I think the biggest issue, though, is that our representatives aren't thinking of the economic benefits on a "government" scale, but rather on a personal scale. If they support caps on big businesses…sure, the government wins as a whole. But individual representatives might be less likely to be voted back into office, they might receive less funds from big business lobbyists, and any potential gains from the cap system would be diffuse across the whole government so that benefits to any one representative are negligible. When it comes to this issue of "who to blame," I think it then rests on our representatives for worrying more about their own futures than about our futures.
ReplyDelete