When I think about the
visiting or experiencing wilderness, I think about hiking in a public place, camping in tent, and being low maintenance.
These millionaires obviously had different ideas; they viewed wilderness
as something they could buy and enjoy while still enjoying all of the luxuries
they have in the city. They probably
would never even imagine going to the Adirondacks if it meant that they had to
tough it and be uncomfortable. This has
made me reflect on how people from different social backgrounds experience
wilderness in different ways and that there is no correct way to experience
wilderness. Both wealthy and poor can both obtain the same benefits and
happiness from being in nature.
Sunday, October 19, 2014
The wealthy in the Adirondacks
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
As we saw today after talking through our Great Camp designs, our social backgrounds definitely affect the way we go about experiencing the wilderness as a home (even a vacation home). We can often still leave our house, and our amenities, and go out into the playground that is the Adirondack Park, but we expect our plumbing and electricity to be there when we return. I also found it extremely interesting talking about the Great Camp owners' bringing their urban luxuries with them juxtaposed with the efforts of the philosophers at the Philosophers' Camp to leave all of that behind. Instead, they were attempting to absorb nature as they experienced it, bring it back to their city lives, and apply it.
ReplyDelete